A Multi-Phased Approach for Deep Tunnel Detection at a Gold Mine Remediation Site
Zonge, 2012. Presented at the U.S. EPA Hardrock Mining Conference 2012. Conference Topic: Innovative Technology Applications
Nicole Pendrigh, Zonge International, Inc.;
Paul Ivancie and Kurt Zeiler, AMEC Environment and Infrastructure;
Phil Sirles, Zonge International, Inc.
The objectives of the first phase of the geophysical program (June 2011) was to characterize the geology of the host rock and the mineralized fault zone, as well as to determine the location of the tunnel system, if possible. Time-domain resistivity results indicated a high resistivity background with lower resistivity fluid conduits, but were unable to image deep enough to detect the mine tunnel. Initially, the MALM was used as a reconnaissance survey, with large distances between the lines covering the overall trend of the Big Five and Dew Drop tunnels. However, MALM data also showed potential to optimize the placement of drill holes meant to intersect the geologic structure associated with the mine, or intersect the tunnel itself.
Using the mine tunnel as a transmitting electrode, the MALM survey technique was able to image its approximate position 2000 feet into the mountain side, at depths of up to 500 feet. The effectiveness of using the tunnels as electrical transmitters may be dependent on seasonal variations in water levels. Given good seasonal conditions and continuity of cultural features (e.g., rails) and water, the MALM in-tunnel electrode techniques can be used as a tool for tunnel location.
Multiple drill locations were chosen based off of the MALM results. The first two holes were less than 30 feet apart and failed to intersect the tunnel; thus, crosshole electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) was acquired between the borings. Based on the crosshole ERT results, a third boring was drilled on the ERT anomaly and intersected the tunnel. It was determined the initial borehole missed the tunnel by less than 5 feet laterally. A second location was drilled further along the fault trend. The tunnel was expected to be at a depth of approximately 450 feet. During drilling, a large void was encountered at approximately 350 feet, and extended several hundred feet downward. This boring was likely drilled into a previously unknown shaft or winze system.